Click on subject to read:-
During the recent meeting of the G7 leaders in Cornwall, all Falmouth businesses were forced to close for 16 days, despite the summit being held only over a weekend. The huge security operation included ground, air and sea cover and policing alone cost £70 million. The drive to merge police and the military was evident in this exercise.
Local people living in the vicinity of the summit location, found fencing and bollards put up in front of their homes, preventing many from leaving their homes for the duration of the event.
AMERICA'S DR. FAUCI UNDER FIRE
18th June 2021
America's medical adviser to the Biden Administration, Dr. Anthony Fauci, has been criticised for lying before Congress and eventually admitting that American taxpayers had funded the Wuhan Laboratory of Virology where the so-called 'gain of function' experiments took place. The Wuhan Laboratory is now widely believed to be the most likely source of the Covid-19 virus and that the virus was 'weaponised' in order to make humans more susceptible to catching it and passing it on.
Early suggestions that the virus was leaked from the Wuhan Laboratory were strongly denied and suppressed. Jamie Metzl, a W.H.O. Advisory Board Member, described the suppression as '..thuggery and scientific propaganda'. Any reference to 'lab leaks' were marked as disinformation on social media and posts deleted. The UK Medical Journal, The Lancet, published a letter signed by 27 scientists denying the possibility of a 'lab leak'. Interestingly, it was The Lancet which was again caught out by publishing a fake 'peer reviewed' study on Hydroxychloroquine, purporting to show that it was useless and dangerous as a medicine for Covid-19. The fraud was quickly revealed by Australian scientists and the study was withdrawn, but not before harm was done to the reputation of the drug. Lancet editor, Dr. Richard Horton, is still in his position.
Dr. Gerard Delepine and his wife Dr. Nicole Delepine, are both outspoken critics of Big Pharma and government bureaucracy and are well known and respected in Europe. After assessing evidence from around the world, Dr. Delepine concluded that it suggests that the Covid-19 injections are leading to more deaths and infections.
Dr. Delepine made a careful analysis of the pre and post inoculation trends for fourteen countries worldwide and noted:
'..and everywhere they have been followed by a dramatic rise in new infections and mortality for several weeks or months...it is high time to go back to the proven facts and to their critical examination. In all countries, experimental vaccinations were followed by an increase in contamination and mortality attributed to Covid-19 and the appearance of mutants.'
The full article by Dr. Delepine is on:
The Delepines' own website is:
The latest figures for reported deaths and injuries from the Covid-19 inoculations for Europe are:
Pfizer alone accounted for 5,961 deaths and 452,779 injuries
The Indian Bar Association (IBA) served a legal notice for contempt of court and crimes against humanity to Director General of the W.H.O., Dr. Tedros Adhanom Gebreyesus and Chief Scientist Dr. Soumya Swaminathan. IBA is a private bar association based in Mumbai. Dr. Soumya continued to make public statements urging people not to use Ivermectin, a safe medicine proven to deal effectively with Covid-19. Judgement was initially passed by the Hon. High Court of Bombay at Goa on 29th May 2021 that ordered Dr. Soumya to stop saying these things.
The IBA has called for action under Section 302 (murder), 304(11) (culpable homicide), 88 (act not intended to cause death) and 120(b) (party to criminal conspiracy).
The second legal notice states that Tedros and Swaminathan are executing criminal conspiracy hellbent on preventing people from returning to normality.
In a statement, the IBA said 'It is crystal clear that you, Noticee 1 and 2, do not have scientific evidence except jugglery of words and you are thoroughly dishonest people who are playing with the lives and livelihoods of the common people across the world. However, in order to expose your intellectual dishonesty to the entire world, this Notice is being served, calling for an explanation within 7 days of the receipt of this Notice.'
The respondents have until 20th June 2021 to reply.
PFIZER SKIPPED CRITICAL TESTING & CUT CORNERS ON QUALITY
16th June 2021
Newly seen documents show that Pfizer did not carry out critical testing and they cut corners on quality standards. The regulatory documents reveal that Pfizer didn't examine biodistribution and pharmacokinetics before submitting their product to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for review. This proves the doubts raised by many groups of independent doctors, scientists and researchers, which so far have been ignored. It has now been proven that the product does not stay in the location of injection, but spreads throughout the body and is able to target vital organs.
In addition, the company did not follow good laboratory practice (GLP) which is intended to assure quality and integrity.
This proves the validity of independent laboratory analysis used to support the demand that the inoculation should be immediately withdrawn, pending thorough examination. To date, there appears to be no intention to do this.
The UK Medical Freedom Alliance (UKMFA) have sent a letter of complaint to Professor Sridhar after she made claims on BBC Newsround – misleading claims including that the Covid-19 vaccines are 100% safe, that the benefits of the vaccine to children outweigh any risks, and that children should get the jab to protect their parents.
In a statement, the UKMFA said that they decided to write the open letter because the “simplified and biased message” is “deeply irresponsible” and amounts propaganda. They requested that Professor Sridhar retracts their message in its entirety and issues a public apology for failing to include the important facts of the risks of children receiving the Covid-19 vaccine.
The letter reads as follows:
We would like to share with you our Open Letter to the MHRA dated 7 June 2021 regarding Covid-19 vaccines for children. authorisation-of-the-pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-for-children.
This is in response to your recent appearance on BBC Newsround, where you made several statements which are entirely unsupported by scientific evidence.
Concerns are mainly related but not limited to the following points:
1. You state the benefit of the vaccine for children would be that they then “don’t need to worry about Covid-19”. Children are already in a position where they do not have to worry about Covid-19, as the risk to them is close to zero.
2. You state that another benefit would be that they then are likely to not infect their parents. Children do not play a major role in transmission, and there is also no evidence from the regulatory trials that the vaccines prevent transmission. This is clearly a statement intended to provoke an emotional response of guilt followed by a sense of duty, and as such it is propaganda rather than factual advice.
3. You state that the main downside of getting the vaccine is that it is “another injection into your arm”. This is a gross misrepresentation of the known and unknown risks of potential serious adverse effects of the Covid-19 vaccines for children. We are sure you are aware that the CDC in the US is calling an emergency meeting, specifically to discuss the hundreds of cases of myocarditis that have occurred in young people after the vaccine (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9672233/The-Latest-WHO-warns-delta-variant-hold-Europe.html).
Life-threatening effects and deaths have been reported in young adults and children in the US and Israel, which you do not refer to at all.
You will find the relevant references to all those points in our Open letter.
In the current situation, which is fraught with uncertainty and fear, the public is looking to professionals for balanced advice. To present such a simplified and biased message is, in our opinion, deeply irresponsible. When it is targeted specifically at a vulnerable group of children, it is unforgivable.
We note that the currently accessible version of your statement on Newsround has already been redacted, as you originally claimed 100% safety for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. You must have been aware that declaring any medical intervention 100% safe undermines anyone’s credibility.
Editing a feature after it has already been circulated and viewed by huge numbers of the public and children, without a publicized explanation or apology, is highly irregular. The comment at the end of the written transcript, merely noting a correction, will not reach the majority of the audience who have heard and assimilated your initial claim.
We therefore request that you immediately retract your entire message and issue a clear public apology for misrepresenting the facts relating to the safety concerns of Covid-19 vaccines in children.
We request that your retraction and apology are circulated as widely as your initial message, and specifically to all schools where this material may have been shown to children.
We are expecting a response confirming that you have taken appropriate action, or otherwise justify the reasons why you have not done so.
UK Medical Freedom Alliance
The letter is a response to Devi Sridhar’s feature on BBC Newsround, which was shown to children in schools across the UK, where she encouraged children to get the vaccine when they are offered to do so. However, the qualified BBC nutritionist failed to mention the deadly risks that could occur if children are injected with the experimental vaccine, anything ranging from blood clots to paralysis – it would be heartbreaking to see the total adverse reaction count of 878,966 continue to increase, especially including injuries to children.
This letter to Devi Sridhar follows another open letter that the UKMFA wrote to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) on the 8th of June regarding the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine for children. The letter cited evidence of known and potential “harms to children that may result and the serious ethical issues this decision raises.”
Microbiologist Dr. Robin Wakeling had been working on the development of PCR tests in New Zealand and was 'cancelled' when he wrote to the New Zealand Health Authorities:
'The media is reporting positive PCR test results as new cases of Covid 19. Could you please explain why such a basic and critical error remains unchecked by government policy...?
THREE WEEKS TO FLATTEN THE CURVE & SAVE THE NHS
15th June 2021
Following months of restrictions, which are still continuing, a review of the NHS data for hospital occupancy will show us whether we were successful in saving the NHS.
If we take the peak of the pandemic, which was April to June 2020 and compare hospital bed occupancy with the previous three years, this should give us a good idea of the strain that the NHS was under.
2017 April - June 91,724 beds occupied
2018 April - June 91,056 beds occupied
2019 April - June 91,730 beds occupied
2020 April - June 58,005 beds occupied
Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, one of the most famous doctors and scientists in his field, worked with colleagues in Germany to prove that the inoculations are lethal. This information will be made public in the next few days. In this two minute clip, Prof. Bhakdi makes an impassioned plea not to let your children have the shot, 'otherwise you will be committing a crime'.
Professor Jay Bhattacharya, Professor of Medicine at Stanford University's Center for Primary Care and Outcomes Research, stated recently 'Historians will look back on lockdowns as the most catastrophic event of all human history, in terms of the scope of the harm that it's caused...every single poor person on the face of the earth has faced some harm, sometimes catastrophic harm, from this lockdown policy.'
The Professor noted that government scientific advisors 'remain attached' to the policy of lockdown, in spite of the total 'failure of this strategy'. 'Almost from the very beginning, lockdown was going to have enormous collateral consequences, things that are sometimes hard to see but are nevertheless real. Serious mental and physical illnesses have been basically ignored and 'we closed our eyes to them because we were so scared about the virus and so enamoured with this idea that the lockdown could stop the virus.'
Prof. Bhattacharya was one of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, which received tens of thousands of signatures from medical and public health scientists, but was ignored by governments.
The Doctors4CovidEthics group recently revealed the following:
A freedom of information request (FOI) request was made by one of our members in February 2021 to the Australian drugs regulator, the TGA (Therapeutic Good Administration) to ask what should have been simple questions. The TGA is the Australian equivalent of the FDA (US), MHRA (UK) and EMA (Europe) and is held in high regard worldwide. Essentially the FOI questions were:
Did the TGA request the raw data from Pfizer
Did any of the committees approving the vaccine look at the raw data and/or discuss it
What were the “studies” referred to in the approval document relating to teratogenicity (risk of harm to a fetus)
The rationale of the request relates to concern over the validity and verifiability of Pfizer’s data given its legal history (and expressed by Peter Doshi in the BMJ in February) as well as the proven concerns over fraudulent data relating to Covid-19 as seen in the “Lancetgate” scandal of June 2020.
The document below is a redacted version of the documents that were sent by the TGA in response to this request. What they show is that the TGA never saw or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accepted their reporting of their study as true. This means that when the head of the TGA John Skerritt said that “the safety evidence is pretty thorough” on the 6th February (here) his words would ring hollow to most Australians who have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that the TGA had actually looked at the patient data themselves.
A further concerning aspect of the FOI request is the efforts to which the TGA appeared to go to suppress the request – initially requesting a 6 months extension in view of a “voluminous request” which eventually yielded only one document of 14 pages, heavily redacted. This required an instruction from the Office of the Information Commissioner to the TGA to answer the request by the 26th May, a deadline that the TGA also failed to meet.
Eventually the only document that was produced from the FOI request was a heavily redacted single study (not studies, as claimed in the TGA assessment document) showing that the only investigation into the effects on the fetus was performed on 44 rats with no long term data on the offspring. It is impossible to assess this study fully because 98% of the document was removed in order to protect Pfizer’s intellectual property (points 32-44 of the report).
The full FOI report should appear on the TGA website in due course at the following link
CALL FOR IMMEDIATE HALT TO COVID VACCINES
13th June 2021
Dr. Tess Lawrie, Director of Evidence Based Medicines Consultancy, has assessed the deaths and adverse effects from the Covid inoculations to date and has called for an immediate halt to the rollout. Citing the 888,196 reported adverse effects and 1,253 deaths during the initial approximately five month period from start of the inoculation, she cited the 185,474 cases of nervous system disorders and 13,766 incidents of bleeding and clotting and requested further information. Her letter to the Chief Executive of the Medicines Regulatory Agency (MHRA), Dr. June Raine, is reproduced in full below.
Dr. Lawrie is not the first doctor and scientist to call for the withdrawal of the emergency authorisation of Covid-19 injections. Previous requests have fallen on deaf ears.
Dear Dr Raine,
RE: Urgent preliminary report of Yellow Card data up to 26th May 2021
As the Director of the Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd and EbMC Squared CiC, I am writing to share with you this urgent preliminary report on the Yellow Card data up to 26th May 2021. Please note that EbMC Squared CiC is a Community Interest Company that conducts research mandated by the public and funded by public donations. We have no conflicts of interest and do not engage in industry-funded work.
The MHRA describes the purpose of its Yellow Card system as providing “an early warning that the safety of a medicine or a medical device may require further investigation. It is important for people to report problems experienced with medicines or medical devices as these are used to identify issues which might not have been previously known about.”
Furthermore, the MHRA recognises that the conditions under which medicines are studied in clinical trials do not reflect how the medicines will be used in hospitals or clinical practice once they are rolled out. This Means that some adverse drug reactions “may not be seen until a very large number of people have received the medicine.”
The Covid-19 vaccines were rolled out in the UK on the 8th of December 2020. As of the 6th May 2021 nearly 39 million people have received their first dose of the Covid-19 vaccine, and 24 million both doses. Sufficient data have now accumulated to get a good overview of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). I would, therefore, like to draw your attention to the high number of covid-19 vaccine-attributed deaths and ADRs that have been reported via the Yellow Card system between the 4th January 2021 and the 26th May 2021. In total, 1,253 deaths and 888,196 ADRs (256,224 individual reports) were reported during this period.
To facilitate a better clinical understanding of the nature of the adverse events occurring, primarily to inform doctors at the frontline, we have searched the Yellow Card reports using pathology-specific key words to group the data according to the following five broad, clinically relevant categories:
A. Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs
B. Immune System ADRs
C. ‘Pain’ ADRs
D. Neurological ADRs
E. ADRs involving loss of Sight, Hearing, Speech or Smell
F. Pregnancy ADRs
After running each search, we entered the results into an Excel spreadsheet, excluding ADRs that were clearly irrelevant or appeared in duplicate. These spreadsheets will be used going forward to facilitate the weekly monitoring of Yellow Card data. We recognise that keywords may need expanding to capture category relevant ADRs that may have been missed in this preliminary ADR scope and analysis.
A. Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic Adverse Drug Reactions
We used the following SEARCH TERMS to identify bleeding, clotting and ischaemic ADRs: bleed, haemo*, thrombo*, emboli*, coag*, death, ischaem*, infarct*, angina, stroke, cerebrovascular, CVA.
We included the term ‘death’ in this search group, as this term accounted for many reported fatalities (438) without specific details. Given the large number of fatalities without a specific cause of death, we considered that ADRs reported in this way, in particular as ‘sudden death’, would be most likely to occur from haemorrhagic, thrombo-embolic or ischaemic events. Given the seriousness of this ADR, we considered it justifiable to do this pending a Freedom of Information (FOI) request to clarify the cause of death in these 438 people.
Using these search terms, 13,766 bleeding, clotting and ischaemic ADRs were identified – 856 of which were fatal. Government reports have highlighted the occurrence of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, apparently accounting for 24 fatalities and 226 ADRs up to the 26th May 2021.However, our analysis indicates that thromboembolic ADRs have been reported in almost every vein and artery, including large vessels like the aorta, and in every organ including other parts of the brain, lungs, heart, spleen, kidneys, ovaries and liver, with life-threatening and life-changing consequences. The most common Yellow Card categories affected by these sorts of ADRs were the nervous system (152 fatalities, mainly from brain bleeds and clots), respiratory (with 103 fatalities, mainly from pulmonary thromboembolism) and cardiac categories (81 fatalities).
B. Immune System Adverse Drug Reactions (Infection, Inflammation,Autoimmune, Allergic)
We used the following SEARCH TERMS to identify immune system ADRs: INFECTION (category), IMMUNE DISORDERS (category), -itis; immun, multiple sclerosis, lupus, myasthenia, pernicious, diabetes, Addison, Crohn’s, Coeliac, Graves, alopecia, amyloidosis, antiphospholipid, angioedema, Behcet’s, pemphigoid, psoriasis, aplasia, sarcoidosis, scleroderma, thrombocytopenia, vitiligo, Miller Fisher, Guillain-Barre; allerg*, urticaria, rash, eczema, asthma.
To the 26th May, a total of 54,870 ADRs and 171 fatalities fell into this category, which comprised the second most common cause of post-vaccination fatalities after ‘Bleeding, Clotting and Ischaemic ADRs’. However, only 4 associated fatalities were reported under the Yellow card ‘IMMUNE DISORDERS’ category, with the majority (141 fatalities associated with 19,474 ADRs) reported under the ‘INFECTIONS’ category. Among 1,187 people for whom post-vaccination COVID infection was reported, there were 72 fatalities (6% of reported COVID infection ADRs).
Many ‘INFECTION’ category ADRs indicated the occurrence of re-activation of latent viruses, including Herpes Zoster or shingles (1,827 ADRs), Herpes Simplex (943 ADRs, 1 fatal), and Rabies (1 fatal ADR) infections. This is strongly suggestive of vaccine-induced immune-compromise.Bell’s palsy, also associated with latent virus reactivation, is reported in the Neurological ADRs section of this report (D). Also suggestive of vaccine-induced immunocompromise was the high number of immune-mediated conditions reported, including Guillain-Barré Syndrome (280 ADRs, 6 deaths), Crohn’s and non-infective colitis (231 ADRs, 2 deaths) and Multiple Sclerosis (113 ADRs).
Allergic responses to the vaccines comprised 25,270 reported ADRs, with 4 fatalities occurring among 1,001 people experiencing anaphylactic reactions.
C. ‘Pain’ Adverse Drug Reactions
We used the following SEARCH TERMS to identify pain ADRs: pain, -algia.
Pain ADRs accounted for at least 157,579 ADRs (18%) in total. A large number of these were arthralgias (joint pains – 24,902 ADRs) and myalgias (muscle pains – 31,168 ADRs), including fibromyalgia (270 ADRs), a long-term condition that causes pain all over the body. Among Congenital Disorders (usually conditions present from birth) there were 11 reports of Paroxysmal Extreme Pain Disorder (PEPD), which is an extremely rare inherited disease caused by a genetic mutation leading to dysfunction of voltage-gated sodium channels. The head was the most common location for pain, but abdominal pain, eye pain, chest pain, pain in extremities, and anywhere else that pain can be imagined was reported. Headaches were reported more than 90,000 times and were associated with death in four people (excluding deaths reported to be from other causes, that may also have involved headache).
D. Neurological Adverse Drug Reactions
In addition to examining ADRs in the NERVOUS SYSTEM DISORDERS (category), we used the following SEARCH TERMS to identify neurological ADRS specifically involving paralysis,neurological degeneration, and convulsive ADRs as follows: (paralysis), palsy, paresis,neuropathy, incontinence, Guillain-Barre, Miller Fisher, multiple sclerosis; (neurodegeneration)encephalopathy, dementia, ataxia, spinal muscular atrophy, delirium, Parkinson; (seizure),convuls, seizure, fit, -lepsy
Twenty-one percent (185,474) of ADRs were categorized as Nervous System Disorders in theYellow Card system. A wide variety of neurological ADRs were noted, including 1,992 ADS involving seizures and 2,357 ADRs involving some form of paralysis, including Bell’s palsy (626ADRs). Other ADRs involving encephalopathy (18), dementia (33), ataxia (34), spinal muscular atrophy (1), Parkinson’s (18) and delirium (504) may reflect post-vaccination neurodegenerative pathology.
The majority of fatalities associated with Nervous System ADRs occurred as a result of central nervous system haemorrhages – 127 fatalities out of the 186 fatalities reported as Nervous System fatalities. These 127 have been counted in group A (Bleeding, clotting and IschaemicADRs).More information is needed to determine the extent of the morbidity associated with this alarmingly large category of ADRs. Access to the full Yellow Card database and consultation with clinical specialists, along with follow up of these reports, is urgently needed.
E. Adverse Drug Reactions involving loss of sight, hearing, speech or smell
We used the following SEARCH TERMS: speech, taste, smell, olfactory, blind, sight, visual,vision, deaf, hearing.
There were 4,771 reports of visual impairment including blindness, 130 reports of speech impairment, 4,108 reports of taste impairment, 354 reports of olfactory impairment, and 704 reports of hearing impairment.
F. Pregnancy Adverse Drug Reactions
Given that vaccinated pregnant women comprise a small proportion of the vaccinatedpopulation in the UK up to 26th May 2021, there appear to be a high number of Pregnancy ADRs(307 ADRs), including one maternal death, 12 stillbirths (reported as 6 stillbirths and 6 foetaldeaths, but only 3 listed as fatal(?)), one newborn death following preterm birth, and 150spontaneous abortions. We have submitted a FOI request as to the cause of the maternal death and will look into pregnancy and congenital ADRs in more detail in our next report.
Limitations of this rapid reportThis report is not comprehensive, and analysis of Yellow Card data is ongoing. The process of defining the search terms was iterative and we trust that it provides a basis for discussion among clinicians and scientists. We have not compared the frequencies of ADRs between different vaccines; however, our impression is that ADRs were not limited to any particular vaccine brand(AstraZenenca, Pfizer and Moderna) or type (mRNA and DNA) currently used in the UK. UK ADRdata mirror data reported on the World Health Organization’s pharmacovigilance database (www.Vigiaccess.org). On the latter, most reported ADRs to date (941,774 ADRs and 5,474deaths) have occurred among individuals in the 18 to 44 years and 45 to 64 years of age categories (38% and 35%, respectively); the vast majority (72%) of reported ADRs have occurred among women. Unfortunately, we have been unable to examine the UK Yellow Card data according to age and gender due to lack of data availability.
We are aware of the limitations of pharmacovigilance data and understand that information on reported Adverse Drug Reactions should not be interpreted as meaning that the medicine in question generally causes the observed effect or is unsafe to use. We are sharing this preliminary report due to the urgent need to communicate information that should lead to cessation of the vaccination roll out while a full investigation is conducted. According to the recent paper bySeneff and Nigh (1), potential acute and long-term pathologies include:
• Pathogenic priming, multisystem inflammatory disease and autoimmunity
• Allergic reactions and anaphylaxis
• Antibody dependent enhancement
• Activation of latent viral infections
• Neurodegeneration and prion diseases
• Emergence of novel variants of SARSCoV2
• Integration of the spike protein gene into the human DNA
The nature and variety of ADRs reported to the Yellow Card System are consistent with the potential pathologies described in this paper and supported by other recent scientific papers on vaccine-induced harms, which are mediated through the vaccine spike protein product (2,3). It is now apparent that these products in the blood stream are toxic to humans. An immediate halt to the vaccination programme is required whilst a full and independent safety analysis is undertaken to investigate the full extent of the harms, which the UK Yellow Card data suggest include thromboembolism, multisystem inflammatory disease, immune suppression,autoimmunity and anaphylaxis, as well as Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE).
Due to the need for expedience, we have not detailed all ADRs in this preliminary report. The Existing Yellow Card data covering just under a five-month period indicate that the extent of morbidity and mortality associated with the COVID-19 vaccines is unprecedented.Age and gender specific data, as well as the time from vaccination, are required to further our analysis of these data and we have sent Freedom of Information Requests (FOIRs) to the MHRAin this regard.
In addition, urgent independent expert evaluation and discussion is required to assess whether the novel vaccines may be causing gene mutations among recipients, as suggested by the occurrence of usually extremely rare genetic disorders, such as Paroxysmal Extreme PainDisorder (PEPD). In addition to the 11 cases of PEPD on the Yellow Card system, there are currently 12 reports of this extremely rare condition on the WHO’s Vigiaccess.org database and10 on the European Medicines Agency’s (EUDRA) pharmacovigilance database. Are these ADRs occurring in babies of vaccinated pregnant women, or spuriously among vaccinated adults? This question needs urgent attention.
As pharmacovigilance data are known to be substantially under-reported, we recommend that the MHRA urgently publicises these ADR data and assists people with their ADR reporting, to facilitate full elucidation and clarification of the extent of the problem.The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans. Preparation should be made to scale up humanitarian efforts to assist those harmed by the COVID-19 vaccines and to anticipate and ameliorate medium to longer term effects. As the mechanism for harms from the vaccine appears to be similar to COVID-19 itself, this includes engaging with numerous international doctors and scientists with expertise in successfully treating COVID-19.
There are at least 3 urgent questions that need to be answered by the MHRA:
1 How many people have died within 28 days of vaccination?
2 How many people have been hospitalised within 28 days of vaccination?
3 How many people have been disabled by the vaccination?
EbMC Squared CiC remains at your service to assist with further analysis. We kindly request full access to the Yellow Card database with immediate effect to enable a comprehensive,independent and accurate evaluation of the Yellow Card data, which will be undertaken in collaboration with clinical experts.
Dr. Tess Lawrie (MBBCh, PhD)
Director, Evidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd and EbMC Squared CiC
VACCINATED PEOPLE TOLD NOT TO TRAVEL
12th June 2021
Media in Spain and Russia were apparently reporting recently that airlines are addressing the problem of blood clots in Covid-19 vaccinated people and recommending that they do not travel. A headline on Russian online media read 'Covid-19 vaccinated people can be excluded from air travel!'
The London Evening Standard countered these reports by stating that the risk of blood clots when flying is the same for the vaccinated as the unvaccinated.
Multiple reports of blood clots following Covid-19 inoculation are borne out everywhere but because of lack of investigation, it is not known how serious or widespread the problem is.
When students arrived for their High School Prom in Exeter, New Hampshire, USA, those who had not received a Covid-19 inoculation were marked with a 'Sharpie' pen (with washable ink) and tracked throughout the evening. Parental Rights advocate, Ann Marie Banfield, reported this on her blog, 'Granite Grok'.
'If they were on the dance floor, they had to raise their hands after every three songs so their numbers could be recorded by other underclass students for contact tracing purposes.....we truly feel they are literally branding our kids if they don't get this experiential (six) 'emergency' approved vaccine....'
The list of students not inoculated was apparently left on a table outside after the prom for anyone to see.
MARKED WITH YELLOW STAR AND LOADED ON TRAINS.....
11th June 2021
During Nazi Germany, Jewish people were segregated, marked with a yellow star....and ultimately loaded on trains to a concentration camp.
In Britain today, there are those calling for segregation of the inoculated and those not inoculated, with privileges accorded to those who go along with the government's agenda, which is to inoculate every citizen, shortly to include all the children too. Once the groups have been segregated, perhaps only those accepting the injection will be allowed to go to sporting and cultural events, the theatre, a museum, perhaps ultimately the supermarket.... These ideas have already been mooted, but put on hold, for now. The so call 'vaccination certificate' is already up and running, ready for the extension of its use domestically. In some freedom demonstrations, both in Britain and elsewhere, protesters have been seen wearing yellow stars, but instead of being marked 'jude', which is German for jewish, the stars are marked 'unvaccinated'. There have been calls in Germany to outlaw the wearing of yellow stars at protests.
As those who were unfortunate enough to rush to Portugal recently in the hope of taking a holiday discovered, travel abroad for everyone seems to be off the agenda. How long before segregation applies to travel within our own country? This has already happened in Canada.
What is clear is that this cannot be about 'health'. The injections are not proven to prevent disease, or to prevent passing it on. The only claim by the manufacturers is that it will reduce the severity of any symptoms.
TAKEDOWN OF GATES-FUNDED MEDIA
11th June 2021
On the morning of Tuesday 8th June, the websites of the BBC, The Guardian, CNN and other media websites were taken down in what was deemed to be a mysterious cyberattack. What was interesting was that all the media companies affected received funding from Bill Gates! In addition, Amazon, Ebay and the UK government were also taken down! Services were restored by midday. At this stage, it is not known who was behind the attack, if it was deliberate.
NO CHOICE BUT TO SPEAK OUT AGAINST LOCKDOWN
11th June 2021
Harvard Epidemiologist Martin Kulldorf had to find another social media platform when Twitter blocked his account for the fourth week. 'Being correct means that we embarrassed some immensely powerful people...they are never going to forgive us.'
'....I had no choice but to speak out against lockdowns...as scientists, we have been stunned and disheartened to witness many strange scientific claims made during this pandemic, often by scientists...'
VACCINE SHEDDING: DR. LEE MERRITT
10th June 2021
A celebrated former military doctor and bioweapons expert, Dr. Lee Merritt has recently been speaking out about vaccine shedding. Her research has led her to investigate the reality of self-propagating vaccines. She and other doctors and scientists agree that inoculated people are shedding spike proteins, but there has been no consensus on how serious this is for those not inoculated who come into close contact.
In a recent discussion with other doctors, all of whom had come across numerous patients claiming to have been 'damaged' by close contact with inoculated persons, particularly women, a new website was announced for those affected to self-report their experiences. Doctors and scientists have now collaborated on an online study. It can be found at www.mycyclestory.com. Initially, many women were reporting strange vaginal bleeding and menstrual cycles being disrupted on Facebook pages. The Facebook groups were soon removed. The groups reformed on Instagram and these too were removed.
If you have had any of these experiences, whether you are a man or woman, please check out the website www.mycyclestory.com
The link to the New American interview with Mr. Lee Merritt is below:
UK GOVERNMENT PUSHING COVID-19 INOCULATION FOR CHILDREN
10th June 2021
On 4th June 2021, the Pfizer injection was given emergency authorisation for use in children of 12+ in the UK. During the extremely short and small clinical trial, 86% of children suffered adverse reactions, ranging from mild to severe.
The UK Medicine Regulator, known as MHRA, whose responsibility it is to approve drugs, was awarded over £980,000 for its collaboration with the Gates Foundation and the W.H.O.
9th June 2021
It is worth reposting this interesting clip from a spy within the Facebook organisation, leaked to independent journalists at Project Veritas, as it gives the lie to Facebook owner, Mark Zuckerberg's persistent 'fact checking' and blocking of any narrative contrary to the world governments' party line on the subject of the Covid-19 inoculation. Any post querying or debating any aspect surrounding the injections, including side effects, even if true, is being scrubbed.
MORE ON COVID-19 INJECTIONS CAUSING MAGNETISM
9th June 2021
Medical researcher and health economist, Dr. Jane Ruby, has recently discovered why those getting the Covid-19 inoculation become magnetic. In a recent interview on StewPeters.tv, she explained how magnetic particles are used as a delivery system to get the inoculation into cells, using a component called polymag. This component is readily available and she named a company in Germany called Chemicell, which sells it 'for research use only.....they are not to be used for any human diagnostic or any drug intended for humans.'
Dr. Ruby's message is echoed by many scientists, but not on mainstream media. The clip from the StewPeter.tv show is below:
According to the UK government's Yellow Card statistics, from the start of Covid-19 vaccination in December 2020 until 26th May 2021, there have been 1,253 deaths and 888,196 adverse reactions reported, with Astra Zeneca having the highest numbers.
In Europe, according to the EudraVigilance website from start of Covid-19 vaccination to 5th June 2021, there have been 13,867 deaths and 1,487,353 adverse reactions.
It is generally thought that only 10% of events are reported.
In the past, if a vaccine has caused only a handful of deaths, it would be 'pulled' immediately and a full investigation carried out. To date, this has not happened
Following repeated 'bullying' from his local medical centre to get the experimental Covid-19 injection, a patient decides to remove himself from their patient list so as to put an end to the repeated calls and to 'protect' against any further action in the future. It took him three months to accomplish this, as each time he asked, the medical centre ignored or refused his request:
'..If it is not illegal for me to be taken off your practice's list of patients, I should like to do this, please. I do not believe that I have to give my detailed reasons.
However, I have been dismayed at how the NHS has become politicised and is now operating as though it is an arm of the government. The NHS 'app' has become a surveillance tool to discriminate and is now detailing extremely personal information. I have seen members of my own family distraught that they were unable to see a doctor or a dentist, children being subjected to awful tests at school, giving them anxiety and nightmares with no support for parents as to how they could opt out and reassurance that children are the least likely to catch, pass on or die from Covid-19. Science was (and is) sidelined and the BMA didn't challenge anything or speak out. Doctors said nothing when misleading information was put out. Friends have died quickly of cancer because no early treatment was available. Older friends have been washing down their post and groceries for over a year because there was no one to advise them that this was unnecessary. I have lost confidence in the NHS.
Despite my 'label' and being older, I take full responsibility for myself.'
NHS OPT OUT TO AVOID YOUR PERSONAL MEDICAL RECORDS BEING SEIZED
7th June 2021
The UK government has plans to collect every single citizens medical records from G.P. 's and put them into a single data base, containing every test, diagnosis, medication, vaccination, and G.P.'s notes on every patient. Once done, people will have relinquished all control over what happens to these personal details.
If you wish to stop this happening to your records and those of family members for whom you are responsible, the link to the opt-out website is below. The deadline for opting out is 30th June 2021.
REFUSING A VACCINE FOR WORK - LETTER TEMPLATE
7th June 2021
I am writing to you as I have been informed by ____ that I must receive the Covid19 vaccine, or face disciplinary action.
As I have made very clear to ____, I am declining all forms of the Covid19 vaccine for ethical reasons.
There are no statutory provisions that can force individuals to become vaccinated. The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 specifically states that members of the public should not be compelled to undergo any mandatory medical treatment, including vaccinations. Forcing, coercing or manipulating an employee to receive a vaccine is in breach of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects people from being interfered with physically or psychologically and includes mandatory vaccinations. Furthermore, the Covid-19 vaccination is experimental, as human trials are still ongoing. Nor has it undergone animal trials, and as such it has only emergency authorisation. All of this is in breach of the Nuremberg Code and other International Laws.
I want to make it very clear, that I am NOT placing any persons at risk by declining this vaccine, as according to the World Health Organisation and accepted by countries worldwide, there is no evidence that it protects anyone from catching or spreading Covid-19. I am protecting my health and my wellbeing. Declining this vaccine does NOT mean that I can not perform my job effectively and I will not be resigning.
In accordance of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and Section 6 of the 2010 Equality act, I am protected from being sacked or chosen unfairly for redundancy and I am safeguarded against unlawful discrimination by my employer.
When signing my work contract, I did not agree for any testing, vaccine or interventions.
I enjoy my job and I would like to keep this as civil as possible, but as per my rights, I will be taking legal action via The ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures if I receive disciplinary action because of this.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Luigi Warren, a co-founder of vaccine producing company, Moderna, who worked on the MRNA technology, had his Twitter post fact-checked and his account blocked for confirming that vaccinated people do shed spike proteins. He stated that the amount of shedding was miniscule and would not be sufficient to cause harm to others.
He is appealing Twitter's response to his post!
NEW STUDY SHOWS THOSE WHO HAVE HAD COVID PROBABLY IMMUNE FOR LIFE
6th June 2021
A new study recently published in Nature Journal show that people who have had Covid are probably immune for life.
'Many people who have been infected with Sars-Cov-2 will probably make antibodies against the virus for most of their lives.' The research team, led by Jackson S. Turner of Washington University School of Medicine, discovered that infection induces long lived bone marrow plasma cells. The link to the published article is below:
After denying they were considering it, and then announcing they were looking into it, followed by a 'trial' period of use for concerts and football matches, the idea has been quietly dropped. There has been push back from many human rights groups who have pointed out that such a proposal is illegal.
This decision comes only a few days after Israel announced they were scrapping domestic vaccine passports, the so called 'Green Pass'. In addition, Israel has lifted all restrictions on indoor and outdoor gatherings, which Health Minister Edelstein claimed was the result of rigorous consultations with health officials. This comes after spending billions on introducing the system and UK Cabinet Minister Michael Gove making a trip to Israel to study their system prior to introducing it in Britain.
COMPARISONS BETWEEN DEATH BY PFIZER AND DEATH BY ASTRA ZENECA
4th June 2021
With the publication of deaths and injuries caused by the individual Covid-19 injections, there has been comparison as to which brand causes the most deaths. Although Astra Zeneca is in front with causing the most injuries, it appears that in Europe, the Pfizer jab causes many times the number of deaths than the Astra Zeneca injection. However, in Britain, Astra Zeneca causes more deaths.
European commentators have apparently blamed the 'anti Pfizer campaign' on Russia, but an underground investigation has recently discovered that it was Astra Zeneca that was behind it, despite the figures being taken from official websites. As the websites for reporting adverse effects are passive, it is thought that only 10% or less of the incidents are reported.
BIDERMAN'S CHART OF COERCION
5th June 2021
Many of the UK (and other country's) team of advisers during the 'pandemic' have been behavioural psychologists. It is interesting to compare the average citizen's experience of the past year or so with Biderman's Chart of Coercion. This chart details non-physical techniques of torture and is recognised generally as the definitive guide to this type of treatment.
The link to the chart is below and the eye is drawn to the following:
- deprives victim of social support
- makes victim dependent
- punishes resistance and independence
- eliminates information not in compliance with demands
- mysterious changes of treatment
- creates anxiety and despair
- enforcement of rules
- fixes attention on immediate predicament
In 2010, the UK Government admitted to using applied psychology in a document called Mindspace. At the bottom of page 66 of this document, the Government boasts that it can change the way people think and behave, and that people will not be aware that this has been done to them. It adds the caveat that if someone does realise that their behaviour is changed, they will not know how it was changed. Additionally, the British Government was meeting with French political psychology teams to produce joint plans. Secret meetings took place in the guise of a charity called the Franco-British Council, which was ostensibly set up to improve relationships between the two countries. The implication at that time was that these applied techniques would be used across the EU.
On 22nd March 2020, a meeting which included Dr. David Halpern, was not properly minuted but a briefing sheet was put out in which it was admitted that the UK government was going to use applied psychology to increase fear in the population. At the same time, Germany did exactly the same thing, even using similar words, and their document which was later leaked, was known as the 'panic paper.'
In addition, it said that communities were going to be used to put pressure on their neighbours, for example, to wear a mask, to adhere to social distancing, etc. Significantly, they also said this had to be done with some care, because it was possible this situation could get out of control.
Fearful messages and images were used by government and the media. Rules were frequently changed, and were often conflicting or unclear. This was part of creating uncertainty and fear. When people are distressed, confused and fearful, they are very susceptible to further messages and instructions.
PEER REVIEWED STUDY SHOWS IVERMECTIN USE COULD END PANDEMIC
3rd June 2021
The Covid-19 injections received emergency use authorisation around the world because it was contended that there were no effective treatments for the virus, despite much evidence to the contrary.
A new peer reviewed study is about to be published in the American Journal of Therapeutics and includes a most comprehensive review of the available data taken from clinical, in vitro, animal and real world studies. It shows that global use of Ivermectin could end the Covid-19 pandemic. The research was led by Front Line Covid-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) members Dr. Pierre Kory and Dr. Paul Marik, who themselves were pioneers in the successful use of Ivermectin for much of the last year.
The link to the FLCCC website is below:
CRIMINAL CHARGES FILED AGAINST SWISS COVID TASKFORCE
3rd June 2021
The head of the Swiss Covid TaskForce, Martin Ackermann and colleagues are being sued for fraud under Article 258 of the Criminal Code 'for deliberate repeated publication of implausible scenarios about Intensive Care beds.' The charges also include false statements about hospital deaths and manipulation of data and constantly changing reasons for tightening or maintaining restrictive measures on the public.
The legal action is being brought by five associations and seven private individuals and the Zurich Limmat Public Prosecutors office is now requested to open a criminal investigation.
Canadian vaccine expert, Dr. Byram Bridle, Associate Professor on Viral Immunology at University of Guelph, has recently publicised a peer reviewed study that showed how the spike proteins alone are causing most of the damage experienced by people taking the Covid-19 inoculation. He and several international collaborators had access to a study called the Bio Distribution Study from the Japanese Regulatory Agency.
The shocking conclusions are that the spike protein is a toxin, and that far from the 'vaccine' substance staying in the injection site, it circulates throughout the body and crosses the blood brain barrier. Once the spike proteins get into the blood they can cause damage to the vital organs. The Study is being published in the Oxford University Press for the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Further details are below:
On 25th May 2021, the Indian Bar Association served a legal notice on Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, the Chief Scientist for the World Health Organisation, for spreading disinformation and misleading the people of India in order to fulfil her own agenda. It is alleged that she deliberately ignored and suppressed the Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) and the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development Team (BIRD) data regarding the effectiveness of Ivermectin to dissuade people in India from using it. Ivermectin has been used in India with great success and areas that have used it have seen a dramatic decrease in the number of hospitalisations and deaths.
The Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) and All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIMS) have refused to give in to Dr. Swaninathan's pressure and have continued to recommend the use of Ivermectin.
The FLCCC website is:
FACEBOOK WHISTLEBLOWER REVEALS CENSORSHIP OF VACCINE COMMENTS
1st June 2021
Former Facebook data technician, Morgan Kahmann, recently gave an interview in which he revealed the company's agenda in suppressing negative comments online about the covid inoculation, which is considered 'hesitancy;
'....content that the company deems to show hesitancy toward COVID-19 vaccines are flagged by its algorithms and assigned a “score” to determine whether it should be removed.
“Anything that questions the vaccine or the narrative regarding the vaccine, which is, you know, everyone should get the vaccine and the vaccine is good and you’re not going to get many bad side effects, anything outside of that realm is basically considered under ‘vaccine hesitancy’ by Facebook’s algorithms,” Kahmann said.
“They’re afraid of what people might conclude if they see that other people are having negative side effects. They think that this is going to drive up vaccine hesitancy among the population and they see that as something that they have to combat.”
Kahmann said that he decided to come forward because he “wouldn’t be able to live with myself” after seeing the documents that outline what appears to be a censorship campaign by Facebook.
“My moral compass says that is not the right thing to do because basically, the users at Facebook are not aware that this is going on, and if you’re using Facebook or a social platform and they’re censoring the content of your comments unbeknownst to you, I think that’s highly immoral,” he said.